There was no proportional systematic bias for observer A (p = 0.068), whereas there was significant bias for observer B (p = 0.014). There was no proportional systematic bias for any observer (p = 0.412 and p = 0.114, respectively). There was proportional systematic bias for observer A (p = 0.045), whereas there was no proportional systematic bias for observer B (p = 0.202). There was proportional systematic bias for both observers (both p = 0.002). There was proportional systematic bias for observer A (p = 0.038), but not for observer B (p = 0.154). There was proportional systematic bias for both observers (p = 0.004 and p = 0.043, respectively). The dotted lines are the mean of the difference and the 95% limits of agreement (☒ SD) between the VAT of reading 1 of observer A and the solid lines of reading 1 of observer B Bland‐Altman 95% limits of agreement plots for the agreement between the various software programs (provided on the X‐axes and Y‐axes) for VAT (cm 2).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2023
Categories |